<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anime &#8211; a product of commercialism or art?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://animeyume.com/blog/index.php/2009/11/14/anime-a-product-of-commercialism-or-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://animeyume.com/blog/2009/11/14/anime-a-product-of-commercialism-or-art/</link>
	<description>Mainichi Anime Yume</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:16:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jura</title>
		<link>http://animeyume.com/blog/2009/11/14/anime-a-product-of-commercialism-or-art/#comment-98859</link>
		<dc:creator>Jura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 02:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animeyume.com/blog/?p=958#comment-98859</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really understand how it can&#039;t be both. Even with profit, adaptations, and restrictions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really understand how it can&#8217;t be both. Even with profit, adaptations, and restrictions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Suzukawa</title>
		<link>http://animeyume.com/blog/2009/11/14/anime-a-product-of-commercialism-or-art/#comment-98857</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Suzukawa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 02:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://animeyume.com/blog/?p=958#comment-98857</guid>
		<description>Your post touches on the old debate between &quot;art&quot; and &quot;commerce.&quot;  I don&#039;t think the two are mutually exclusive.

I can think of two examples that prove this point in two different ways.  First (and I am loathe to even bring up this anime, as you know I have issues with it), there&#039;s Evangelion - an anime I personally find tedious in many ways (irritating whiny protagonist, too-artsy and deliberately-confusing-ending, and now - endless sequels/re-tellings of the same damn story).  Evangelion is considered &quot;art&quot; - AND it is also a huge commercial success.

The second example is Naruto - which is often derided for being derivative and for being &quot;too commercially successful.&quot;  Regardless of how much Kishimoto had dollar or yen signs in his head when he concocted the story and characters in Naruto, the fact that it is such a huge commercial success proves that it touches many people on an emotionally resonant level.  Just because something is wildly popular doesn&#039;t mean it isn&#039;t also art, IMO - it can actually mean that its creator has explored universal themes in a very effective way - which is, in my book - art.

Didn&#039;t mean to hijack your post with a book-length comment.  ;)  Obviously, your post has made me think(!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your post touches on the old debate between &#8220;art&#8221; and &#8220;commerce.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t think the two are mutually exclusive.</p>
<p>I can think of two examples that prove this point in two different ways.  First (and I am loathe to even bring up this anime, as you know I have issues with it), there&#8217;s Evangelion &#8211; an anime I personally find tedious in many ways (irritating whiny protagonist, too-artsy and deliberately-confusing-ending, and now &#8211; endless sequels/re-tellings of the same damn story).  Evangelion is considered &#8220;art&#8221; &#8211; AND it is also a huge commercial success.</p>
<p>The second example is Naruto &#8211; which is often derided for being derivative and for being &#8220;too commercially successful.&#8221;  Regardless of how much Kishimoto had dollar or yen signs in his head when he concocted the story and characters in Naruto, the fact that it is such a huge commercial success proves that it touches many people on an emotionally resonant level.  Just because something is wildly popular doesn&#8217;t mean it isn&#8217;t also art, IMO &#8211; it can actually mean that its creator has explored universal themes in a very effective way &#8211; which is, in my book &#8211; art.</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t mean to hijack your post with a book-length comment.  ;)  Obviously, your post has made me think(!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

